Replicate. Refute. Improve the evidence.
An invitation to independent researchers: our published observations are falsifiable hypotheses, not claims you are expected to endorse. We seek independent reproductions, counterexamples, alternative methods, and carefully documented negative results.
State: scientific research draft open to critique. The canonical GitHub corpus is public, and its Issues support authenticated independent critiques and counterexamples. Some replication kits remain incomplete and are labeled accordingly. Gitea is a prospective secondary mirror, not the submission authority.
Four scientific challenges
CUDA-05D — Linux identities and namespaces
Question: can a namespace-local root user be mapped to a distinct host principal? Our single trial did not demonstrate such a distinction. A valid counterexample must show the actual UID observed by the receiving service using SO_PEERCRED, together with a control.
Study and limits · Bounded public data
CUDA-05E — Socket authorization and DAC
Question: can a server running under a genuinely distinct host UID reject both a connected but unauthorized client and another client blocked by filesystem access rules before connection? We observed this within a disposable Docker laboratory and invite researchers to falsify its assumptions and boundary.
New: independently implemented CUDA-05G falsification kit. Public code and protocol; one completed local trial, external replication pending.
Frozen preregistration · Study and limits · Bounded public data
CUDA-05F — Rust GPU supervisor and fault recovery
Question: do identity and revocation gates still hold together through actual CUDA/Vulkan computation and child failures? Ten operational gates passed in a bounded laboratory, while three earlier runs revealed meaningful failures. Complete runtime source is not yet available for independent public replication.
Frozen preregistration · Study and preserved failures · Experiment contract
CUDA-05H — Open GPU numeric witness
Can a real GPU reproduce 6,144 exact integer results across CPU, CUDA and Vulkan? Independent MIT-licensed source and oracle; one local trial passed, outside replication pending. Not a reproduction of the private blob.in GPU engine.
CUDA-05H study and protocol · Structured results
How independent contributions will work
A falsifying result should identify a claim and frozen Git revision, specify the machine and controls, preserve raw observations including error conditions, identify the preregistered criterion it contradicts and supply reasonable reproduction instructions. Original authors should be able to respond without erasing or changing earlier results.
The proposed contribution contract and machine-readable challenge register are available. Submit a replication or counterexample through GitHub Issues (GitHub account required). CUDA-05F replication remains limited by unpublished runtime sources.
Our commitment
We will distinguish observation, independent replication, falsification, review, and production authorization. Documented disagreement must remain addressable even when it refutes our own conclusion. A private-data checksum is not access to evidence, and no local verdict is a universal claim.